The Nye vs. Ham Debate: Some Post-Game Reflections

bill-nye-dominated-his-debate-against-creationist-ken-hamWell two major confrontations are now over in February of 2014, the Super Bowl and the worldview showdown between Bill Nye and Ken Ham. Everyone agrees that the former clash proved to be no contest. The only highlight that the Broncos could produce was their journey out of the tunnel to the field before the game started. But the latter event turned out to be somewhat of a rhetorical tug of war between two congenial opponents. Now at the outset, let me say that there will be many people today and in days to come who will probably offer in-depth analysis of this debate because it caused such an internet stir leading up to its live streaming last night. All I would like to do now is just provide a few post-debate observations regarding certain themes that rose to the surface as these men made their respective cases.   Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Creation vs. Evolution: Something to keep in mind before the Nye vs. Ham Throwdown

ken-ham-620x379A bit of a brouhaha is being stirred over an upcoming debate that is going to happen in February between the famous Bill Nye (a.k.a., the Science Guy because of his award winning program for children on PBS-TV, Bill Nye the Science Guy) and President and Founder of Answers in Genesis, Ken Ham. The immediate backdrop to this debate developed when Nye had a short video recorded last year in which he expressed his concern that creationism would prevent younger generations from being optimal contributors to society when they became adults. So he made an appeal to parents not to shackle their children with unsupportable religious convictions about creation because they are scientifically untenable and eventually would be non-existent in years to come anyway.  Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Reflecting on the Olivet Discourse: Some Final Thoughts

p058Previously, I have been talking about various evangelical proposals regarding the meaning of the Olivet Discourse. Now aside from the strict futurism of dispensationalism, the proleptic futurism of inaugurated eschatology, and the opposite pendulum of preterism, I want to close out this discussion by mentioning just a few items that I believe evangelicals need to consider as they continue to wrestle with this important segment of prophetic Scripture. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Reflecting on the Olivet Discourse: How do Preterists Interpret its Content?

doj_preterismAside from what dispensationalists and advocates of inaugurated eschatology propose when trying to understand the OD, in this post I want to discuss how pockets of evangelicals known as preterists read it. Deriving from the Latin words “praeter,” (i.e. beyond) and “ire” (i.e., go), the word denotes the concept of “being in the past” and historically it has been used to describe a specific way of interpreting the book of Revelation. The idea being that the majority of its visions pointed solely to the events leading up to and culminating in the destruction of Jerusalem. So while the vast majority of John’s Apocalypse provided descriptions of impending events which would transpire in the immediate future of the first century church, they are now ancient remnants of our past.

The relevance that this deduction has for the OD is that advocates of preterism, or preterists, interpret it essentially the same way. Like Revelation, it records how Judaism’s role in redemptive history would end, not human history as a whole. That being said, while there is general consensus on how the elements of the OD only referred to the temple’s destruction, there is sharp disagreement within preterist camps as to whether any New Testament prophecies beyond the OD await fulfillment in the future at all. To clarify these differences, I will summarize the basic preterist outline for interpreting the OD and then highlight the impasse between those who consider themselves to be classical/traditional/partial preterists and those who are known as full preterists.  Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment